By Jonas Kiriko

Seizures of ivory and other items from protected wildlife species including apes are a frequent occurrence in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, due to corruption and the lack of adequate mechanisms for storage and traceability, these objects remain for long periods in the premises of the institutions that seized them, exposing them to repeat thefts by traffickers.

To put an end to this situation, wildlife protection activists are urging the government to create several reserves to accommodate rescued wildlife, strengthen the security of existing reserves, and start burning ivory and other seized wildlife items to prevent them from falling back into the illegal circuit.

Almost every month, the national police, the customs services, and the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN) conduct seizures of protected wildlife species and ivory. Border posts, car parks, airports, ports, hotels and private homes are among the places where these seizures are reported in the DRC.

One of the record seizures was recorded at Uvira in South Kivu province in 2022, with almost half a ton of ivory, equivalent to around 20 elephants slaughtered, according to estimates by Kahuzi Biega National Park officials. 

Elephant in Kazinga Channel
An elephant waters on the Kazinga Channel in Queen Elizabeth National Park. © Tuver Wundi

Some of the ivory bore markings (place, weight and date), suggesting that they were objects stolen from a stockpile somewhere in the DRC – the subject of another previous seizure or storage. However, traffickers also sometimes use fake permits or mark the ivory themselves in an attempt to deceive officials that it was part of an authorised operation, according to an environmental activist based in Uvira, who asked for anonymity to protect himself.

Worse still, despite the arrests, the destination of the seized ivory is not currently known, regrets Josué Aruna, president of the environmental civil society of the province of South Kivu.

“That is what is happening. I’ll give you the example of Uvira. It [ivory] was seized, but today we don’t know its destination. We are not certain that they [ivory] were transmitted to Kinshasa… For this case of Uvira, it is to return to the black market, since nothing has filtered on the destination; nothing leads us to know that they were handed over to the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN) or transferred to Kinshasa (capital of the DRC),” Aruna said.

It is becoming increasingly common to find seized items in the hands of traffickers. In July 2022, four traffickers, including a pastor of a local church arrested three months earlier in Bukavu, the capital of South Kivu province, were sentenced by the Bukavu High Court for detention and illegal possession of elephant tusks. 

The #WildEye Eastern Africa map by Oxpeckers Investigative Environmental Journalism in partnership with InfoNile tracked 134 cases of wildlife crime in the DRC between 2017 and 2023. However, most cases stopped at arrests and did not document the status of court cases and convictions. 

Many traffickers of illegal wildlife were arrested as they were en route to Uganda through eastern DRC cities and towns, including Butembo, Beni, Goma, Bukavu, and Garamba National Park on the border of South Sudan. 

Arresting traffickers and bringing them to justice is not enough to fight wildlife crime in the DRC. Although there have been some prosecutions and convictions, there is no guarantee that the seized ivory will not fall back into the hands of other traffickers, either due to lack of a storage mechanism or through corruption.

In July 2021 in Butembo, a large urban center located near the Virunga National Park in the province of North Kivu, an operation by ICCN to shadow an alleged poacher failed, dumping around 50 kilograms of ivory into the hands of the inhabitants and thus escaping the control of state services, according to police estimates.

In Lubumbashi, further south in the country in the province of Haut Katanga, baby chimpanzees were stolen from a sanctuary. The kidnappers demanded USD $200,000 from the sanctuary owner before handing over these animals.

Examples multiply where police stations or ranger patrol posts are attacked and dispossessed of seized objects or even release detainees including poachers and traffickers.

These attacks are the work of local and foreign armed groups that are active in and near national parks and protected areas in the DRC. Since the end of 2022, the southern part of Virunga National Park has been largely under the control of the M23 rebels as well as the Nyantura militia. As a result, monitoring of the gorilla groups has stopped. 

Mountain gorilla from the Binyindo family in the Bwindi Impenetrable Forest, © Tuver Wundi

This lack of surveillance increases poaching and exposes baby gorillas to trapping by poachers, worries Bienvenu Bwende, who is in charge of communication at Virunga National Park. He added that in the center of the park the Mai Mai and FDLR militias attack the park’s fauna and flora, while in the north there is the threat of the ADF rebel group.

Kivu Security Tracker, a project by New York University's Congo Study Group and Human Rights Watch, lists more than half a dozen armed groups that practice illegal cross-border trade between the DRC and Uganda. Revenues generated by traffic of the park’s natural resources are estimated at USD $175 million per year, and more than 100,000 people derive a direct livelihood from these illegal activities.

Between 2017 and 2020, an estimated $50 million contributed to the enrichment of militias and armed groups. Money from kidnappings, robberies and murders adds to their power. The fees collected at the various randomly established tolls also represent indirect revenue for the militias. 

International trafficking mainly involves ivory and precious wood. These represent a serious threat, especially for elephants, but their impact remains relatively low compared to local trafficking.

Effective security systems are lacking in DRC’s reserves and other protected areas. Sanctuaries managed by private individuals organize their own security, and national parks are protected by often understaffed and ill-equipped eco-guards. This predisposes them to intrusions by poachers from armed groups, illegal miners and loggers, or wildlife traffickers. Some authorities are also part of these illegal groups.

Anicet (alias) has trafficked in elephant tusks. In a village located in the Beni territory, North Kivu province near Virunga National Park, he is known as a butcher specializing in the sale of beef. He testifies that given the resemblance between ox horns and ivory, it is easy to pass one off as the other, without being detected by the police or other state services.

“To move our herds, we leave at night to allow the animals to move long distances without getting tired. I took the opportunity more than once to transport ivory to big cities like Butembo without anyone noticing,” revealed this man in his 40s.

During the 18th session of the Conference of the Parties for the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), held in Sri Lanka in 2019, CITES said it is “aware of a number of thefts of ivory from government-held stockpiles in recent years” around the world.

Existing but silent laws on storage of seized items

National efforts to combat poaching and the illegal trade in wildlife products are hindered by decentralized management of existing ivory stocks and challenges in tracing the origins of some stocks. A 2020 report by TRAFFIC, an international organization fighting against the trafficking of fauna and flora, affirms the fact that in the DRC, “there is no national system for managing ivory stocks.”

Instead, the ivory is dispersed within several state structures, including the Central Bank of Congo (BCC), the patrol posts of the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), the General Directorate of Customs and Excise (DGDA), the courts and tribunals, police stations, and provincial/local environmental services.

This decentralization predisposes the ivory to theft and corruption, because each service that seizes can keep the ivory or cash for an unlimited period.

In 2022, CITES DRC released a progress report on the implementation of its National Ivory Action Plan (PANI), stating that DRC was “on track” in regards to “inventorying existing ivory stocks and developing, at the national level, a reliable system for the storage and management of confiscated ivory.” However, it provided no other details expounding on this progress. Two years after the publication of the TRAFFIC report, there is still no centralized storage mechanism in DRC for illegal wildlife products.

DRC’s national legal and regulatory framework does not address the management of elephant ivory stocks. However, in practice, protected wildlife species such as ivory that is seized or found on the carcasses of dead elephants or on the ground are entrusted to the ICCN.

“This institution stores it in its offices and/or sites while waiting to consign them to the Mint of the Central Bank of Congo, which would hold fairly large stocks of ivory. Other ivory is stored in the prosecutors’ offices, customs warehouses, provincial environmental coordination offices or even in the stations of the various protected areas (products seized by guards during anti-poaching patrols) of the ICCN. The stocks held are not inventoried and no exact figure has, to date, been given or the way in which they are kept,” according to the TRAFFIC report.

The 2014 Congolese law relating to the conservation of nature provides in its article 83 that "the specimens and products, as well as the objects used in the commission of offenses against this law, are confiscated and entrusted to the public body responsible for conservation.”

However, the law did not clearly mention the specific body that should ensure the custody of the seized objects. In Article 36, instead, the law mandated that “the province sets up a public body whose mission is to manage protected areas of provincial and local interest. A decree deliberated in the Council of Ministers or an order of the provincial governor, as the case may be, fixes the status.”

The name of the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), which was created in 1975 and modified in 2010, does not appear in this law as the body responsible for storing seized objects, whereas the ICCN’s establishment was prior to the passing of the wildlife law. In addition, the law provides for the establishment of similar bodies at the provincial level for the management of protected areas of provincial and local interest. This also clearly suggests that the legislation was planning for the establishment of new future bodies to manage wildlife items.

Corruption and influence peddling undermine this sector

“When it comes to biodiversity, it is often very difficult, in a corrupt judicial system, to bring evidence before a judge. Currently with corruption, we happen to contribute to the arrests of poachers with elephant meat for example, but tomorrow before the judge, this meat or the remains will be declared as belonging to a goat. These are cases that we have encountered,” testifies Olivier Ndoole, who has worked as an environmental and land activist in the DRC for 10 years.

“It is the same for the flora. An individual can be arrested making embers in the park or in a protected area. But, in court, we will ask the difference between the embers that come from the park and those from elsewhere to really prove that they come from the park,” he said.

This view is supported by wildlife activist Adams Cassinga, who founded Conserv Congo, a local conservation NGO. Using a network of around 100 focal points (agents) across the DRC, Conserv Congo carries out investigations into crimes against fauna and flora in the Congo Basin. 

“In fact, it is a phenomenon that we have never understood. And, it gets tough when there's a dark hand behind it,” Adams said. He added that he has examples, but won't go public due to fear of his safety. The fight for conservation also comes up against influence peddling - the use of position in exchange for money or favours - which is very common in the DRC.

“The people who are supposed to know and contribute to the protection of wild species, in reality they don't know. This ignorance is even rooted in our leaders, who are supposed to tell us what to do about it. All because conservation, like the rest of the sectors in the DRC, is always politicized,” Cassinga adds. 

Wildlife activist Adams Cassinga holds buffalo remains indicating the existence of this species in the past in the Bombo Protected Area Lumene near Kinshasa © Conserv Congo

According to Cassinga, in the DRC sectors that should be managed by scientists or technicians, such as the conservation of fauna and flora, are penalized by the interference of politicians. This makes it difficult to fight wildlife crime and wildlife trafficking.

For five months during the course of our #WildEye Eastern Africa investigation, we attempted to acquire data on court cases of wildlife crime in DRC from various authorities, including police, courts, customs services, airports, ICCN and CITES DRC, to no avail. This quest included multiple meetings with the managers of these services and their communication officers, where unfulfilled promises were made to share the information. 

For the provinces of North Kivu and Ituri, where a state of siege has been in place since May 2021, all cases under investigation by the civil courts have been transferred to the criminal courts. The latter were overwhelmed by piles of files to process, which meant that our requests fell on deaf ears. Our data therefore is based on publicly available news reports and data collected by the Environmental Investigation Agency between 2017-2023.

This is despite the passing in March 2023 of a new law in DRC on the exercise of freedom of the press. In Article 96, this law obliges any holder of information of public interest to make it available to media professionals. 

Ensure that seized cash and items no longer fall into the hands of traffickers

According to TRAFFIC, it is necessary to define a national management system for elephant ivory stocks for the DRC, taking into account the various sources of ivory, the services competent to collect them, the measurements and marking, recording, storage and securing of stocks, and tools and means for good management. The system should also include regular audits.

The same is true for other wild species for which reserves must be created. In addition to this, there is a need to strengthen the security of existing reserves. For example, the headquarters of Virunga National Park in Rumangabo houses the Senkwekwe Centre, the only facility in the world for orphaned mountain gorillas. Each of these orphans has lost its family as a result of poaching. They are now cared for by expert staff who provide daily care.

Golden monkey
Golden monkey in Mgahinga Gorilla National Park that borders the Virunga park and the Volcano park, © Tuver Wundi

As far as policies are concerned, in 2015, the DRC developed a National Ivory Action Plan (PANI). Its overall objective is to "strengthen the fight against elephant poaching and illicit trafficking in ivory and other elephant specimens in collaboration with all relevant actors.” This plan revolves around seven specific objectives, including that of “improving the system of management and traceability of ivory stock in the DRC. If this plan is implemented, positive progress can be made in the future.

For Adams Cassinga, awareness must be raised to educate the entire Congolese community about the endemic species that the country abounds in and the need to protect them. He proposes to draw inspiration from Kenya and other countries in southern Africa, including South Africa, which, instead of keeping ivories without any assurance of doing so, incinerates them outright. This will prevent them from falling back into the illegal circuit.

For his part, Olivier Ndoole believes that it is necessary to restore the authority of the State, not only in protected areas, but also throughout the national territory. According to him, the black economy of illicit trafficking around Virunga National Park feeds armed groups who promote poaching, cutting wood for embers and fishing illegally on Lake Edward. 

Ndoole also urges for the education of local communities to help them become “intelligence agents” in the fight against crime around fauna and flora.

To fight against poaching and wildlife trafficking, the organization Conserv Congo has already initiated several community projects in livestock and agroforestry. They are found in the Bateke plateau on the outskirts of Kinshasa, in Mokoto in the province of Tshuapa, and in Ikoma in the province of South Kivu. Here, Conserv Congo supports the local communities to practice livestock farming and agroforestry to give them alternative livelihoods instead of poaching and contribute to the preservation of forests and food security in households.

“The objective is to dissuade those who can go into the forest to become a poacher to choose to breed. But also, people in rural areas live only on bushmeat. If someone tells you that they ate meat, you must immediately think of bushmeat. Thus, we allow them to have access to meat near their homes with the aim of contributing to food security,” said Cassinga, head of this organization. 

Activist Adams Cassinga explores the Bateke Plateau where his organization is initiating community livestock projects to ease pressure on wildlife. © Conserv Congo

Conserv Congo plans to soon set up a similar initiative in Sake near Virunga National Park in North Kivu province.

As part of this investigation, we collected the testimony of a former poacher, who now works as a journalist within a community radio station broadcasting from Kyavinyonge, a fishery on Lake Edward located in Beni territory in the province of North Kivu, in the heart of Virunga Park. 

He explains that poaching is often considered the main source of income for the poacher, with the meat intended both for sale and home consumption. He said he only abandoned the practice after becoming aware of the dangers involved in poaching. This awareness has now been reinforced by recognizing the need to conserve wild species for the good of the whole community.

"In radio broadcasts as well as in public speaking forums organized here at home by the partner organizations of Virunga Park, I have been made to understand that if I kill a hippopotamus, I contribute to lake infertility, on whom several families in my locality depend. I also understood that tourism can generate a lot of jobs here at home, if we do not kill the species that are in the park,” he confided.

This former poacher insists on the urgency of giving jobs to the inhabitants who are around the protected areas to dissuade them from violating the parks and getting involved in the illicit trafficking of ivory and wild species.

Today with his microphone and through the Kinande language mainly spoken in the region, he sensitizes his community and raises awareness to lead the protection of fauna and flora, for his own good and that of all of humanity. 

This story was first published and supported by InfoNile, in collaboration with the Oxpeckers #WildEye Eastern Africa project, with funding from Earth Journalism Network's Biodiversity Media Initiative project.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *